Comparison
Pleurotes vs Oesterzwammen
Overall, Oesterzwammen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pleurotes | Oesterzwammen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 15 kcal | 46 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pleurotes has 67% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Pleurotes has no sugar, while Oesterzwammen has 1.1 g.
- Oesterzwammen has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Oesterzwammen has 17% more fiber (2.3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Oesterzwammen has 70% more protein (3.3 g vs 1 g).
- Oesterzwammen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pleurotes
Pleurotes (Pleurotus ostreatus), eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique.
Oesterzwammen
Oesterzwammen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pleurotes or Oesterzwammen?
Overall, Oesterzwammen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pleurotes has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pleurotes has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.