Plantaardige tonijnspread vs Bruinbrood
Overall, Plantaardige tonijnspread has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Plantaardige tonijnspread | Bruinbrood |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 242 kcal | 239 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 13 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bruinbrood has 91% less fat (1.8 g vs 19 g).
- Plantaardige tonijnspread has 67% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.2 g).
- Plantaardige tonijnspread has 58% more fiber (13 g vs 5.5 g).
- Plantaardige tonijnspread has 22% more protein (12 g vs 9.4 g).
- Only Bruinbrood lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Plantaardige tonijnspread
Veganistische spread op basis van erwteneiwit met tonijnaroma Ingrediënten: water, zonnebloemolie, erwteneiwit 17%, maïszetmeel, gehydrolyseerd maïseiwit, tonijnaroma, natuurlijke aroma's, aardappelzetmeel, specerijen, gistextract, rode radijs concentraat, voedingszuur (citroenzuur),
Bruinbrood
Water, volkorenTARWEmeel, TARWEbloem, bakkersgist, moutmeel (GERST, TARWE), bakkerszout, TARWEgluten, enzymen (TARWE), meelverbeteraar: E300, raapzaadolie, geïnactiveerd TARWEdesempoeder, emulgator: raapzaadlecithine, E = door de EU goedgekeurde hulpstof.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Plantaardige tonijnspread or Bruinbrood?
Overall, Plantaardige tonijnspread has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bruinbrood has fewer calories: 239 kcal versus 242 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Plantaardige tonijnspread has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.