Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives vs Whole Kalamta olives
Overall, Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives | Whole Kalamta olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 223 kcal | 249 kcal |
| Fat | 22.9 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 10% fewer calories (223 kcal vs 249 kcal).
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 12% less fat (22.9 g vs 26 g).
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 42% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 3.3 g).
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 26% less salt (2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Whole Kalamta olives has 47% more fiber (3.2 g vs 1.7 g).
- Only Whole Kalamta olives lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives
Not available.
Whole Kalamta olives
Water, Kalamata Olives (42%), Sea Salt, Red Wine Vinegar, Grape Must. May contain traces of nuts (drained) and milk.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives or Whole Kalamta olives?
Overall, Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has fewer calories: 223 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.