Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives vs Olives Kalamata
Overall, Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives | Olives Kalamata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 223 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 22.9 g | 35.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 37% fewer calories (223 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 36% less fat (22.9 g vs 35.9 g).
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 42% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 3.3 g).
- Olives Kalamata has no sugar, while Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 0.5 g.
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 20% less salt (2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Olives Kalamata has 61% more fiber (4.4 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 22% more protein (1.8 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives
Not available.
Olives Kalamata
80% kalamata-olijven, raapzaadolie, zout, water, voedingszuur (E270, E330).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives or Olives Kalamata?
Overall, Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has fewer calories: 223 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olives Kalamata has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.