Comparison
Oliven Kalamata vs Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives
Overall, Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oliven Kalamata | Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 195 kcal | 223 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 22.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oliven Kalamata has 13% fewer calories (195 kcal vs 223 kcal).
- Oliven Kalamata has 13% less fat (20 g vs 22.9 g).
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 21% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 2.4 g).
- Oliven Kalamata has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 49% less salt (2 g vs 3.9 g).
- Oliven Kalamata has 41% more fiber (2.9 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has 22% more protein (1.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Oliven Kalamata
Not available.
Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oliven Kalamata or Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives?
Overall, Pitted Greek Kalamata Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oliven Kalamata has fewer calories: 195 kcal versus 223 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oliven Kalamata has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.