Comparison
Oliven Kalamata vs Whole Kalamta olives
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oliven Kalamata | Whole Kalamta olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 195 kcal | 249 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oliven Kalamata has 22% fewer calories (195 kcal vs 249 kcal).
- Oliven Kalamata has 23% less fat (20 g vs 26 g).
- Oliven Kalamata has 27% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 3.3 g).
- Oliven Kalamata has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Whole Kalamta olives has 31% less salt (2.7 g vs 3.9 g).
- Whole Kalamta olives has 26% more protein (1.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Whole Kalamta olives has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Whole Kalamta olives lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Oliven Kalamata
Not available.
Whole Kalamta olives
Water, Kalamata Olives (42%), Sea Salt, Red Wine Vinegar, Grape Must. May contain traces of nuts (drained) and milk.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oliven Kalamata or Whole Kalamta olives?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oliven Kalamata has fewer calories: 195 kcal versus 249 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oliven Kalamata has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.