Whole Kalamta olives vs Olives Kalamata
Overall, Whole Kalamta olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Whole Kalamta olives | Olives Kalamata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 35.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Whole Kalamta olives has 30% fewer calories (249 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Whole Kalamta olives has 28% less fat (26 g vs 35.9 g).
- Olives Kalamata has no sugar, while Whole Kalamta olives has 0.5 g.
- Olives Kalamata has 27% more fiber (4.4 g vs 3.2 g).
- Whole Kalamta olives has 26% more protein (1.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Only Whole Kalamta olives lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Whole Kalamta olives
Water, Kalamata Olives (42%), Sea Salt, Red Wine Vinegar, Grape Must. May contain traces of nuts (drained) and milk.
Olives Kalamata
80% kalamata-olijven, raapzaadolie, zout, water, voedingszuur (E270, E330).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Whole Kalamta olives or Olives Kalamata?
Overall, Whole Kalamta olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Whole Kalamta olives has fewer calories: 249 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olives Kalamata has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.