Comparison
Oliven Kalamata vs Olives Kalamata
Overall, Olives Kalamata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oliven Kalamata | Olives Kalamata |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 195 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 35.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oliven Kalamata has 45% fewer calories (195 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Oliven Kalamata has 44% less fat (20 g vs 35.9 g).
- Oliven Kalamata has 27% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 3.3 g).
- Olives Kalamata has 36% less salt (2.5 g vs 3.9 g).
- Olives Kalamata has 34% more fiber (4.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Olives Kalamata has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Oliven Kalamata
Not available.
Olives Kalamata
80% kalamata-olijven, raapzaadolie, zout, water, voedingszuur (E270, E330).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oliven Kalamata or Olives Kalamata?
Overall, Olives Kalamata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oliven Kalamata has fewer calories: 195 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olives Kalamata has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.