Pipas vs Pipas de girasol BBQ
Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas | Pipas de girasol BBQ |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 520 kcal | 622 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 51.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 6.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 3 g |
| Salt | — | 2.8 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 8.2 g |
| Protein | 24.6 g | 31.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas has 16% fewer calories (520 kcal vs 622 kcal).
- Pipas has 44% less fat (29 g vs 51.7 g).
- Pipas has 48% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 6.5 g).
- Pipas has 45% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3 g).
- Pipas de girasol BBQ has 67% more fiber (8.2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Pipas de girasol BBQ has 22% more protein (31.5 g vs 24.6 g).
Ingredients
Pipas
Sunflower seeds, salt and flour.
Pipas de girasol BBQ
Pipas de girasol, sal, azúcar, maltodextrina, aroma, aroma de humo, potenciador del sabor (E621, E627, E631), especias, antioxidante (E341), colorante (E160c), espesante (goma guar).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas or Pipas de girasol BBQ?
Overall, Pipas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas has fewer calories: 520 kcal versus 622 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3 g per 100 g.