Pierogi ze szpinakiem i serem vs Pierogi ruskie
Overall, Pierogi ruskie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pierogi ze szpinakiem i sere... | Pierogi ruskie |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 177 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 3.7 g |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pierogi ze szpinakiem i serem has 12% fewer calories (155 kcal vs 177 kcal).
- Pierogi ruskie has 12% less fat (3 g vs 3.4 g).
- Pierogi ruskie has 38% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Pierogi ze szpinakiem i serem has 14% less sugar (2.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Pierogi ruskie has 30% more fiber (3.7 g vs 2.6 g).
- Pierogi ruskie has 35% more protein (8 g vs 5.2 g).
- Pierogi ruskie has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pierogi ruskie is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pierogi ze szpinakiem i serem
mąka _pszenna_, szpinak 28% , woda, ser 9% z _mleka_, płatki ziemniaczane, sól, olej rzepakowy, cukier, przyprawy, błonnik _pszenny_, substancja konserwująca: sorbinian potasu, Może zawierać soję, siarczyny, seler, gorczycę,
Pierogi ruskie
Wheat flour, potatoes (25%), cottage cheese (14%), onion, rapeseed oil, salt, spices.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pierogi ze szpinakiem i serem or Pierogi ruskie?
Overall, Pierogi ruskie has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pierogi ze szpinakiem i serem has fewer calories: 155 kcal versus 177 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pierogi ze szpinakiem i serem has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.