Comparison

Piccalilli vs Piccalilli

Overall, Piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPiccalilliPiccalilli
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 78 kcal 123 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 13.2 g 22 g
Salt 1.2 g 2 g
Fiber 1 g 0.5 g
Protein 0.7 g 0.8 g
Additives52
AllergensMustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Sodium MetabisulphiteMustard flour

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Piccalilli has 37% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 123 kcal).
  • Piccalilli has 40% less sugar (13.2 g vs 22 g).
  • Piccalilli has 42% less salt (1.2 g vs 2 g).
  • Piccalilli has 50% more fiber (1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Piccalilli has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Piccalilli lists: Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Sodium Metabisulphite.
  • Only Piccalilli lists: Mustard flour.

Ingredients

Piccalilli

Water, Cauliflower (19%), Sugar, Silverskin Onions (10%), Gherkins (7%), Spirit Vinegar, Modified Maize Starch, Acid: Acetic Acid; _Mustard_ Flour (2%), Salt, Garlic Purée, Ground Cinnamon, Turmeric, Ground Ginger, Colour: Riboflavin; Preservatives: _Sodium Metabisulphite_, _Sulphur Dioxide_.

Piccalilli

Vegetables (36%) (Cauliflower Florets, Onion, Gherkin, Silverskin Onion, Cauliflower), Water, Sugar, Spirit Vinegar, Salt, Modified Maize Starch, Rice Flour, _Mustard Flour_, Spices (Ground Turmeric, Ground Ginger, Cayenne Pepper), Colour (Riboflavin), Cinnamon Extract

FAQ

Which is healthier: Piccalilli or Piccalilli?

Overall, Piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Piccalilli has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 123 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Piccalilli has less sugar: 13.2 g versus 22 g per 100 g.

More comparisons