Piccalilli vs Sweet piccalilli
Overall, Sweet piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Piccalilli | Sweet piccalilli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 78 kcal | 67 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 13.2 g | 11.1 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | — |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 5 | 3 |
| Allergens | Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Sodium Metabisulphite | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sweet piccalilli has 14% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 78 kcal).
- Sweet piccalilli has 16% less sugar (11.1 g vs 13.2 g).
- Only Piccalilli lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Sodium Metabisulphite.
Ingredients
Piccalilli
Water, Cauliflower (19%), Sugar, Silverskin Onions (10%), Gherkins (7%), Spirit Vinegar, Modified Maize Starch, Acid: Acetic Acid; _Mustard_ Flour (2%), Salt, Garlic Purée, Ground Cinnamon, Turmeric, Ground Ginger, Colour: Riboflavin; Preservatives: _Sodium Metabisulphite_, _Sulphur Dioxide_.
Sweet piccalilli
Vegetables In Varying Proportions (38%) [Cauliflower, Gherkin, Onion, Silverskin Onion], Water, Spirit Vinegar, Sugar, Thickener (Acetylated Distarch Adipate), Mustard Flour, Rice Flour, Salt, Spices, Colour (Riboflavin), Rapeseed Oil, Flavouring, Cinnamon Extract
FAQ
Which is healthier: Piccalilli or Sweet piccalilli?
Overall, Sweet piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sweet piccalilli has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 78 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sweet piccalilli has less sugar: 11.1 g versus 13.2 g per 100 g.