Sweet piccalilli vs Sweet piccalilli
Overall, Sweet piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet piccalilli | Sweet piccalilli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 67 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 7.8 g | 11.1 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Mustard | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sweet piccalilli has 30% less sugar (7.8 g vs 11.1 g).
- Sweet piccalilli has 49% less salt (1.2 g vs 2.4 g).
- Sweet piccalilli has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sweet piccalilli lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Sweet piccalilli
Water, cauliflower (18%), silverskin onion (13%), sugar, gherkins (9%), barley malt vinegar, modified maize starch, salt, preservative (acetic acid), mustard flour, fortified wheat flour (wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), acid (acetic acid), turmeric, cayenne pepper, flavourings
Sweet piccalilli
Vegetables In Varying Proportions (38%) [Cauliflower, Gherkin, Onion, Silverskin Onion], Water, Spirit Vinegar, Sugar, Thickener (Acetylated Distarch Adipate), Mustard Flour, Rice Flour, Salt, Spices, Colour (Riboflavin), Rapeseed Oil, Flavouring, Cinnamon Extract
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet piccalilli or Sweet piccalilli?
Overall, Sweet piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sweet piccalilli has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 67 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sweet piccalilli has less sugar: 7.8 g versus 11.1 g per 100 g.