Comparison

Sweet piccalilli vs Piccalilli

Overall, Sweet piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSweet piccalilliPiccalilli
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 67 kcal 123 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.2 g
Sugars 11.1 g 22 g
Salt 1.2 g 2 g
Fiber — 0.5 g
Protein 0.9 g 0.8 g
Additives32
AllergensMustardMustard flour

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sweet piccalilli has 46% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 123 kcal).
  • Sweet piccalilli has 38% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Sweet piccalilli has 50% less sugar (11.1 g vs 22 g).
  • Sweet piccalilli has 40% less salt (1.2 g vs 2 g).
  • Sweet piccalilli has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Sweet piccalilli lists: Mustard.
  • Only Piccalilli lists: Mustard flour.

Ingredients

Sweet piccalilli

Vegetables In Varying Proportions (38%) [Cauliflower, Gherkin, Onion, Silverskin Onion], Water, Spirit Vinegar, Sugar, Thickener (Acetylated Distarch Adipate), Mustard Flour, Rice Flour, Salt, Spices, Colour (Riboflavin), Rapeseed Oil, Flavouring, Cinnamon Extract

Piccalilli

Vegetables (36%) (Cauliflower Florets, Onion, Gherkin, Silverskin Onion, Cauliflower), Water, Sugar, Spirit Vinegar, Salt, Modified Maize Starch, Rice Flour, _Mustard Flour_, Spices (Ground Turmeric, Ground Ginger, Cayenne Pepper), Colour (Riboflavin), Cinnamon Extract

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sweet piccalilli or Piccalilli?

Overall, Sweet piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sweet piccalilli has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 123 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sweet piccalilli has less sugar: 11.1 g versus 22 g per 100 g.

More comparisons