Comparison

Sweet piccalilli vs Piccalilli

Overall, Sweet piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSweet piccalilliPiccalilli
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 65 kcal 123 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.2 g
Sugars 7.8 g 22 g
Salt 2.4 g 2 g
Fiber 0.7 g 0.5 g
Protein 0.8 g 0.8 g
Additives12
AllergensGluten, MustardMustard flour

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sweet piccalilli has 47% fewer calories (65 kcal vs 123 kcal).
  • Sweet piccalilli has 38% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Sweet piccalilli has 65% less sugar (7.8 g vs 22 g).
  • Piccalilli has 15% less salt (2 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Only Sweet piccalilli lists: Gluten, Mustard.
  • Only Piccalilli lists: Mustard flour.

Ingredients

Sweet piccalilli

Water, cauliflower (18%), silverskin onion (13%), sugar, gherkins (9%), barley malt vinegar, modified maize starch, salt, preservative (acetic acid), mustard flour, fortified wheat flour (wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), acid (acetic acid), turmeric, cayenne pepper, flavourings

Piccalilli

Vegetables (36%) (Cauliflower Florets, Onion, Gherkin, Silverskin Onion, Cauliflower), Water, Sugar, Spirit Vinegar, Salt, Modified Maize Starch, Rice Flour, _Mustard Flour_, Spices (Ground Turmeric, Ground Ginger, Cayenne Pepper), Colour (Riboflavin), Cinnamon Extract

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sweet piccalilli or Piccalilli?

Overall, Sweet piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sweet piccalilli has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 123 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sweet piccalilli has less sugar: 7.8 g versus 22 g per 100 g.

More comparisons