Pfannengemüse Italienische Art vs Bio Gemüse Pfanne
Overall, Bio Gemüse Pfanne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pfannengemüse Italienische A... | Bio Gemüse Pfanne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Gemüse Pfanne has 14% fewer calories (43 kcal vs 50 kcal).
- Bio Gemüse Pfanne has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio Gemüse Pfanne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pfannengemüse Italienische Art
91% Gemüsemischung (Gemüsepaprika rot u. gelb, Zucchini, Brechbohnen, Broccoli, Karotten, Zwiebeln, Aubergine), 2% Oliven, geschwärzt (Oliven, Stabilisator: Eisen-Il-Glucanat), Rapsöl, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Zucker, Gewürze, Kräuter, Olivenöl, Zitronenfruchtpulver (Zitronensaft, Maltodextrin), Maltodextrin. Kann Spuren von Gluten, Hühnerei, Soja, Milch, Sellerie, Senf und Sesam enthalten.
Bio Gemüse Pfanne
25% Zucchini, Broccoli, 15% Karotten, gelbe Karotten, 13% Kirschtomaten, Zwiebeln, natives Olivenöl extra, Kräuter (Basilikum, Oregano), Meersalz, Sonnenblumenöl, Honig, Gewürze
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pfannengemüse Italienische Art or Bio Gemüse Pfanne?
Overall, Bio Gemüse Pfanne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Gemüse Pfanne has fewer calories: 43 kcal versus 50 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pfannengemüse Italienische Art has less sugar: 3.1 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.