Bio Gemüse Pfanne vs Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren
Overall, Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Gemüse Pfanne | Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefrore... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 43 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | — |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren has 33% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 43 kcal).
- Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren has 82% less fat (0.4 g vs 2.2 g).
- Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren has 55% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3.1 g).
- Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren has 47% more protein (3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bio Gemüse Pfanne
25% Zucchini, Broccoli, 15% Karotten, gelbe Karotten, 13% Kirschtomaten, Zwiebeln, natives Olivenöl extra, Kräuter (Basilikum, Oregano), Meersalz, Sonnenblumenöl, Honig, Gewürze
Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren
Broccoli, tiefgefroren. Das Produkt kann Spuren von Gluten und Sellerie enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Gemüse Pfanne or Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren?
Overall, Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Broccoli-Röschen tiefgefroren has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.