Peppered Hot Smoked Mackerel Fillets vs Mackrel
Overall, Mackrel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Peppered Hot Smoked Mackerel... | Mackrel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 244 kcal | 252 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 17.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | — |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | — |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 23.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mackrel has 16% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Only Peppered Hot Smoked Mackerel Fillets lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Peppered Hot Smoked Mackerel Fillets
96% Atlantic Mackerel (Fish), Peppercorns, Salt.
Mackrel
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Peppered Hot Smoked Mackerel Fillets or Mackrel?
Overall, Mackrel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Peppered Hot Smoked Mackerel Fillets has fewer calories: 244 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mackrel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.