Comparison
Maquereau vs Mackrel
Overall, Maquereau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maquereau | Mackrel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 208 kcal | 252 kcal |
| Fat | 11.1 g | 17.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 27.1 g | 23.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maquereau has 17% fewer calories (208 kcal vs 252 kcal).
- Maquereau has 36% less fat (11.1 g vs 17.4 g).
- Maquereau has 38% less saturated fat (2 g vs 3.2 g).
- Maquereau has 12% more protein (27.1 g vs 23.8 g).
Ingredients
Maquereau
Not available.
Mackrel
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maquereau or Mackrel?
Overall, Maquereau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maquereau has fewer calories: 208 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maquereau has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.