Comparison
Mackerel vs Mackrel
Overall, Mackerel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mackerel | Mackrel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 177 kcal | 252 kcal |
| Fat | 9 g | 17.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 3.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 24 g | 23.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mackerel has 30% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 252 kcal).
- Mackerel has 48% less fat (9 g vs 17.4 g).
- Mackrel has 20% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 4 g).
- Only Mackerel lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Mackerel
SGOMBRO, Acqua, Sale.
Mackrel
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mackerel or Mackrel?
Overall, Mackerel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mackerel has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 252 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mackerel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.