Concassé d'artichaut au maquereau vs Mackerel
Overall, Mackerel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Concassé d'artichaut au maqu... | Mackerel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 177 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Fish, Milk | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Concassé d'artichaut au maquereau has 38% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 177 kcal).
- Concassé d'artichaut au maquereau has 61% less fat (3.5 g vs 9 g).
- Concassé d'artichaut au maquereau has 30% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 4 g).
- Mackerel has no sugar, while Concassé d'artichaut au maquereau has 2.5 g.
- Mackerel has 74% more protein (24 g vs 6.3 g).
- Mackerel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Concassé d'artichaut au maquereau lists: Eggs, Milk.
Ingredients
Concassé d'artichaut au maquereau
Artichaut (27%), topinambour, filets de _maquereaux_ (22%), crème (_lait_), eau, jaune d'_oeuf_, vinaigre de cidre, plante aromatique, fécule de manioc, citron, sel
Mackerel
SGOMBRO, Acqua, Sale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Concassé d'artichaut au maquereau or Mackerel?
Overall, Mackerel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Concassé d'artichaut au maquereau has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 177 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mackerel has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.