Pate de ton cu măsline vs Filetes de caballa del sur
Overall, Filetes de caballa del sur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Pate de ton cu măsline
Filetes de caballa del sur
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de ton cu măsline | Filetes de caballa del sur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 209 kcal | 177 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 8.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetes de caballa del sur has 15% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 209 kcal).
- Filetes de caballa del sur has 50% less fat (8.5 g vs 17 g).
- Filetes de caballa del sur has 17% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Filetes de caballa del sur has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Pate de ton cu măsline has no salt, while Filetes de caballa del sur has 1 g.
- Filetes de caballa del sur has 56% more protein (25 g vs 11 g).
- Pate de ton cu măsline has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pate de ton cu măsline
ton 44%, măsline 19%, apă, ulei de semințe de porumb, amidon de orez, arome, agent de îngroșare: gumă de carruba, sare, agent de gelifiere: agar-agar
Filetes de caballa del sur
Є Caballa del sur (pescado) (72%), aceite de oliva (27%) y sal. GRASAS/ ℗ Cavala (peixe) (72%), azeite (27%) e sal. Importado por: Mercadona, S.A. C/ Valencia, 5. 46016 Tavernes Blanques Valencia (España-Espanha) por 100 g VALOR EN de las c dos qua PRATOS Gelos c dos qua Fabricado por: Soc. N. Aveiro Maroc, S.A. Rue Atlas, Zone Industrielle Aït Melloul, BP 117, Agadir (Marruecos - Marrocos) Acuerdo n°: MA 1653 PROTEÍNA SAL PESO NETO PESO LÍQUIL 2x1
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de ton cu măsline or Filetes de caballa del sur?
Overall, Filetes de caballa del sur has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetes de caballa del sur has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetes de caballa del sur has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.