ARGETA Kip paté Halal vs Pate de ton cu măsline
Overall, Pate de ton cu măsline has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | ARGETA Kip paté Halal | Pate de ton cu măsline |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 309 kcal | 209 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans, Milcheiweiß | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de ton cu măsline has 32% fewer calories (209 kcal vs 309 kcal).
- Pate de ton cu măsline has 41% less fat (17 g vs 29 g).
- Pate de ton cu măsline has 19% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 3.6 g).
- Pate de ton cu măsline has 90% less sugar (0.5 g vs 5 g).
- Pate de ton cu măsline has no salt, while ARGETA Kip paté Halal has 1.3 g.
- Pate de ton cu măsline has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only ARGETA Kip paté Halal lists: Milk, Soybeans, Milcheiweiß.
- Only Pate de ton cu măsline lists: Fish.
Ingredients
ARGETA Kip paté Halal
AUFSTRICH MIT 29% HÜHNERFLEISCH-mit Milcheiweiß/Sterilisiertes Produkt/Nettofüllmenge: 95g/Glutenfrei Zutaten: Trinkwasser, gekochtes Hühnerfleisch 29%, pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblumen, Raps, Soja) in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen. Milcheiweiß 3%, Hühnerfett, Kartoffelstärke, konzentrierte Brühe (Wasser, Hühnerfleisch Sojamehl Speisesalz, Gewürze, Hefeextrakt, Gewürzextrakt (Paprika). Kann Eier enthalten. Aufstrich nach dem Offnen gekühlt aufbewahren und innerhalb von 3 Tagen aufbrauchen. Bei Löchern oder Aufblähung der Verpackung Produkt nicht verwendba stens haltbar bis siehe Deckel.
Pate de ton cu măsline
ton 44%, măsline 19%, apă, ulei de semințe de porumb, amidon de orez, arome, agent de îngroșare: gumă de carruba, sare, agent de gelifiere: agar-agar
FAQ
Which is healthier: ARGETA Kip paté Halal or Pate de ton cu măsline?
Overall, Pate de ton cu măsline has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de ton cu măsline has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 309 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de ton cu măsline has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 5 g per 100 g.