Pate de ton cu măsline vs Atún Gran Sabor Isabel
Overall, Pate de ton cu măsline has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate de ton cu măsline | Atún Gran Sabor Isabel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 209 kcal | 450 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 42 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 4.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de ton cu măsline has 54% fewer calories (209 kcal vs 450 kcal).
- Pate de ton cu măsline has 60% less fat (17 g vs 42 g).
- Pate de ton cu măsline has 37% less saturated fat (2.9 g vs 4.6 g).
- Atún Gran Sabor Isabel has no sugar, while Pate de ton cu măsline has 0.5 g.
- Pate de ton cu măsline has no salt, while Atún Gran Sabor Isabel has 0.8 g.
- Atún Gran Sabor Isabel has 39% more protein (18 g vs 11 g).
- Pate de ton cu măsline has the better Nutri-Score.
- Atún Gran Sabor Isabel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pate de ton cu măsline
ton 44%, măsline 19%, apă, ulei de semințe de porumb, amidon de orez, arome, agent de îngroșare: gumă de carruba, sare, agent de gelifiere: agar-agar
Atún Gran Sabor Isabel
Skipjack tuna*, sunflower oil, salt. *Euthynnus (Katsuwonus) pelamis
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate de ton cu măsline or Atún Gran Sabor Isabel?
Overall, Pate de ton cu măsline has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de ton cu măsline has fewer calories: 209 kcal versus 450 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Atún Gran Sabor Isabel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.