Comparison

Paté de Sardinha vs Atún Listado Al Natural

Overall, Atún Listado Al Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPaté de SardinhaAtún Listado Al Natural
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 260 kcal 100 kcal
Fat 22.1 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 4.9 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.5 g 0 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 9.2 g 23.9 g
Additives50
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Atún Listado Al Natural has 62% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 260 kcal).
  • Atún Listado Al Natural has 97% less fat (0.6 g vs 22.1 g).
  • Atún Listado Al Natural has 98% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Atún Listado Al Natural has no sugar, while Paté de Sardinha has 1.5 g.
  • Atún Listado Al Natural has 62% more protein (23.9 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Atún Listado Al Natural has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Atún Listado Al Natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Atún Listado Al Natural lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Paté de Sardinha

Sardinha (70%), água, cenoura, óleo de soja, concentrado de tomate, flocos de batata, margarina (gordura de palma, óleo de colza, água, sal, emulsionantes (E471, E472c, E322), aromatizante, E330, conservante E202 e corante E160a (ii), sal, cebola em pó e farinha de soja. Pode conter vestígios de moluscos.

Atún Listado Al Natural

Atún listado (pescado), agua y sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Paté de Sardinha or Atún Listado Al Natural?

Overall, Atún Listado Al Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Atún Listado Al Natural has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Atún Listado Al Natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons