Paté de Sardinha vs Atún
Overall, Atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paté de Sardinha | Atún |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 260 kcal | 210 kcal |
| Fat | 22.1 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.9 g | 3.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 7.7 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Atún has 19% fewer calories (210 kcal vs 260 kcal).
- Atún has 27% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 4.9 g).
- Atún has no sugar, while Paté de Sardinha has 1.5 g.
- Atún has 33% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Paté de Sardinha has 16% more protein (9.2 g vs 7.7 g).
- Atún has the better Nutri-Score.
- Atún is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Atún lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Paté de Sardinha
Sardinha (70%), água, cenoura, óleo de soja, concentrado de tomate, flocos de batata, margarina (gordura de palma, óleo de colza, água, sal, emulsionantes (E471, E472c, E322), aromatizante, E330, conservante E202 e corante E160a (ii), sal, cebola em pó e farinha de soja. Pode conter vestígios de moluscos.
Atún
Atún, aceite de girasol, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paté de Sardinha or Atún?
Overall, Atún has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Atún has fewer calories: 210 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Atún has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.