Pâté de sardinha vs Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez
Overall, Pâté de sardinha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pâté de sardinha | Pate ibérico al pedro ximene... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 239 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 19.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.1 g | 6.7 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 3.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pâté de sardinha has 24% less saturated fat (5.1 g vs 6.7 g).
- Pâté de sardinha has 62% less sugar (2 g vs 5.2 g).
- Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has 46% less salt (1.9 g vs 3.5 g).
- Only Pâté de sardinha lists: Fish, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Pâté de sardinha
70% sardiner (fisk), vand, gulerødder, sojaolie, tomatkoncentrat, kartoffelflager (kartofler, emulgator (mono-og diglycerider af fedtsyrer), safran), 2% spansk makrel (fisk), margarine, salt, logflager, sojamel.
Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pâté de sardinha or Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez?
Overall, Pâté de sardinha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pâté de sardinha has fewer calories: 239 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pâté de sardinha has less sugar: 2 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.