Comparison

Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez vs Pastel de centollo

Overall, Pastel de centollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPate ibérico al pedro ximene...Pastel de centollo
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — —
Calories 250 kcal 136 kcal
Fat 19.7 g 10.2 g
Saturated fat 6.7 g 4.7 g
Sugars 5.2 g 0.1 g
Salt 1.9 g 1.3 g
Protein 9.4 g 8.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pastel de centollo has 46% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 250 kcal).
  • Pastel de centollo has 48% less fat (10.2 g vs 19.7 g).
  • Pastel de centollo has 30% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Pastel de centollo has 98% less sugar (0.1 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Pastel de centollo has 32% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has 14% more protein (9.4 g vs 8.1 g).
  • Pastel de centollo has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez

Not available.

Pastel de centollo

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez or Pastel de centollo?

Overall, Pastel de centollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pastel de centollo has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pastel de centollo has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons