Pate a las finas hierbas vs Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez
Overall, Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate a las finas hierbas | Pate ibérico al pedro ximene... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 289 kcal | 250 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 19.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.3 g | 6.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | — |
| Protein | 12.7 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has 13% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 289 kcal).
- Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has 24% less fat (19.7 g vs 26 g).
- Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has 35% less saturated fat (6.7 g vs 10.3 g).
- Pate a las finas hierbas has 88% less sugar (0.6 g vs 5.2 g).
- Pate a las finas hierbas has 26% more protein (12.7 g vs 9.4 g).
- Only Pate a las finas hierbas lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Pate a las finas hierbas
Tocino de hígado de cerdo (27.6%), agua, carne de cerdo, proteína animal, cebolla, sal, proteína de soja, azúcar, aromas, especias, proteína de leche, licor de melocotón, antioxidante [E - 301,l, potenciador del sabor [E-621] y conservador [E-250]
Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate a las finas hierbas or Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez?
Overall, Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 289 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate a las finas hierbas has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.