Comparison

Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez vs Crema de Jamón York

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPate ibérico al pedro ximene...Crema de Jamón York
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 250 kcal 311 kcal
Fat 19.7 g 30.4 g
Saturated fat 6.7 g 3.6 g
Sugars 5.2 g 0.8 g
Salt 1.9 g 2.5 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 9.4 g 4.4 g
Additives08
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has 20% fewer calories (250 kcal vs 311 kcal).
  • Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has 35% less fat (19.7 g vs 30.4 g).
  • Crema de Jamón York has 47% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Crema de Jamón York has 85% less sugar (0.8 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has 23% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has 53% more protein (9.4 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Crema de Jamón York has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Crema de Jamón York lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez

Not available.

Crema de Jamón York

Leche, aceite de girasol, magro de cerdo 18%, agua, almidón, aroma, proteína de soja lactosa, dextrosa, sal, estabilizantes (difosfatos, polifosfatos, carragenato), (citratos de sodio, eritorbato sódico), pimienta blanca, azúcar, antioxidantes potenciador de sabor: glutamato monosódico, aroma de humo, extracto de levadura, conservador: nitrito Sódico, colorante: carmín.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez or Crema de Jamón York?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pate ibérico al pedro ximenez has fewer calories: 250 kcal versus 311 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Crema de Jamón York has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons