Paté de atún original vs Pastel frio de atún
Overall, Paté de atún original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paté de atún original | Pastel frio de atún |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 243 kcal | 291 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 20.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paté de atún original has 16% fewer calories (243 kcal vs 291 kcal).
- Paté de atún original has 41% less sugar (1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Paté de atún original has 12% more protein (11 g vs 9.7 g).
Ingredients
Paté de atún original
Not available.
Pastel frio de atún
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paté de atún original or Pastel frio de atún?
Overall, Paté de atún original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paté de atún original has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 291 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paté de atún original has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.