Comparison

Pâte à tartiner caramel vs Biscoff Smooth

Overall, Biscoff Smooth has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPâte à tartiner caramelBiscoff Smooth
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 569 kcal 584 kcal
Fat 34.8 g 38.1 g
Saturated fat 7.9 g 7.6 g
Sugars 62.6 g 36.8 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.5 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0.8 g
Protein 0.8 g 2.9 g
Additives35
AllergensMilkGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Biscoff Smooth has 41% less sugar (36.8 g vs 62.6 g).
  • Pâte à tartiner caramel has 76% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Biscoff Smooth has 88% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Biscoff Smooth has 72% more protein (2.9 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Only Pâte à tartiner caramel lists: Milk.
  • Only Biscoff Smooth lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Pâte à tartiner caramel

sugar, vegetable oil, lactose (from milk), sweet whey powder (from milk), caramelized sugar syrup (1,5%) (caramelized sugar, maltodextrin), emulsifier: sunflower lecithin, natural aroma, plant coloring extract (paprika extract, vegetable oil),

Biscoff Smooth

Corome suits 58% (wheat flour, sugar, vegetable oils (palm, rapeseed, candy sugar syrup, raising agent (sodium hydrogen carbonate), soya flour, salt, cinnamon, vegetable rapeseed oil, sugar, emulsifier (soya lecithin), acid (citric acid Contains wheat and soya which may cause hypersensitivity.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pâte à tartiner caramel or Biscoff Smooth?

Overall, Biscoff Smooth has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pâte à tartiner caramel has fewer calories: 569 kcal versus 584 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Biscoff Smooth has less sugar: 36.8 g versus 62.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons