Pašteta Tuna vs Paté de atún original
Overall, Pašteta Tuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pašteta Tuna | Paté de atún original |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 319 kcal | 243 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paté de atún original has 24% fewer calories (243 kcal vs 319 kcal).
- Paté de atún original has 32% less fat (19 g vs 28 g).
- Pašteta Tuna has 49% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Pašteta Tuna has no salt, while Paté de atún original has 1.2 g.
- Pašteta Tuna has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
- Pašteta Tuna has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pašteta Tuna
kuhano meso od TUNE 32%, voda, suncokretovo ulje, MLIJEČNE bjelančevine 3%, krumpirov škrob, luk, koncentrirani RIBLJI bujon, SOJINO brašno, kuhinjska sol, začini, ekstrakti začina i začinskog bilja (sadrži i ekstrakt CELERA), ekstrakt kvasca, ekstrakt paprike.
Paté de atún original
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pašteta Tuna or Paté de atún original?
Overall, Pašteta Tuna has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paté de atún original has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 319 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pašteta Tuna has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.