Comparison

Pasta venere vs Pan segale

Overall, Pasta venere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPasta venerePan segale
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 341 kcal 208 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 3.6 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.5 g
Sugars 3.2 g 3.7 g
Salt 0 g 1.3 g
Fiber 10.4 g 10.6 g
Protein 12.1 g 5.4 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, MustardGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pan segale has 39% fewer calories (208 kcal vs 341 kcal).
  • Pasta venere has 36% less fat (2.3 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Pasta venere has 14% less sugar (3.2 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Pasta venere has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Pasta venere has 55% more protein (12.1 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Pasta venere has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pasta venere lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Pasta venere

Hartweizenvollkorngrieß (15%) und schwarzes Venere®-Mehl aus braunem Reis (25%). Kann Spuren von Sonne und Senf enthalten. Hergestellt in einer Fabrik, die Eier verwendet.

Pan segale

Semi integrali di SEGALE* (56%), acqua, semi di girasole* (5%), sale marino. * da agricoltura biologica

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pasta venere or Pan segale?

Overall, Pasta venere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pan segale has fewer calories: 208 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pasta venere has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons