Pasta venere vs Mix Rustico
Overall, Pasta venere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pasta venere | Mix Rustico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 341 kcal | 326 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 10.4 g | — |
| Protein | 12.1 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasta venere has 12% less fat (2.3 g vs 2.6 g).
- Mix Rustico has 34% less sugar (2.1 g vs 3.2 g).
- Pasta venere has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Pasta venere has 50% more protein (12.1 g vs 6.1 g).
- Pasta venere has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pasta venere lists: Gluten, Mustard.
Ingredients
Pasta venere
Hartweizenvollkorngrieß (15%) und schwarzes Venere®-Mehl aus braunem Reis (25%). Kann Spuren von Sonne und Senf enthalten. Hergestellt in einer Fabrik, die Eier verwendet.
Mix Rustico
Amidon de maïs, farine de lin 12%, farine de sarrasin 8%, son de petits pois, son de riz, fibre végétale (psyllium), sucre, épaississant: gomme de guar; sel. Peut contenir du soja. SANS LACTOSE SANS BLE. Conserver dans un lieu frais et sec.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pasta venere or Mix Rustico?
Overall, Pasta venere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mix Rustico has fewer calories: 326 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mix Rustico has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.