Bio Haferpops vs Mix Rustico
Overall, Mix Rustico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Haferpops | Mix Rustico |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 391 kcal | 326 kcal |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 2.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mix Rustico has 17% fewer calories (326 kcal vs 391 kcal).
- Mix Rustico has 54% less fat (2.6 g vs 5.7 g).
- Mix Rustico has 44% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Mix Rustico has 87% less sugar (2.1 g vs 16 g).
- Bio Haferpops has 59% more protein (15 g vs 6.1 g).
Ingredients
Bio Haferpops
Not available.
Mix Rustico
Amidon de maïs, farine de lin 12%, farine de sarrasin 8%, son de petits pois, son de riz, fibre végétale (psyllium), sucre, épaississant: gomme de guar; sel. Peut contenir du soja. SANS LACTOSE SANS BLE. Conserver dans un lieu frais et sec.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Haferpops or Mix Rustico?
Overall, Mix Rustico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mix Rustico has fewer calories: 326 kcal versus 391 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mix Rustico has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 16 g per 100 g.