Bio Haferpops vs Madeline senza glutine
Overall, Bio Haferpops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Haferpops | Madeline senza glutine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 391 kcal | 421 kcal |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 26 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 4.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Haferpops has 73% less fat (5.7 g vs 21 g).
- Bio Haferpops has 63% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.4 g).
- Bio Haferpops has 38% less sugar (16 g vs 26 g).
- Bio Haferpops has 70% more protein (15 g vs 4.5 g).
- Bio Haferpops has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bio Haferpops
Not available.
Madeline senza glutine
uova da allevamento a terra 27,3% zucchero, olio di semi di girasole alto oleico, farina di riso 14,8% fecola di patate, destrosio, umidificante: glicerolo (vegetale) sciroppo di glucosio amido di riso addensanti: gomma di guard, aromi emulsionanti: lecitine (colza) agenti lievitanti: difosfati, carbonati di sodio, fosfati di calcio, sale, alcol etilico
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Haferpops or Madeline senza glutine?
Overall, Bio Haferpops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Haferpops has fewer calories: 391 kcal versus 421 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Haferpops has less sugar: 16 g versus 26 g per 100 g.