Bio Haferpops vs Pasta venere
Overall, Pasta venere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio Haferpops | Pasta venere |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 391 kcal | 341 kcal |
| Fat | 5.7 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 16 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 10.4 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 12.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasta venere has 13% fewer calories (341 kcal vs 391 kcal).
- Pasta venere has 60% less fat (2.3 g vs 5.7 g).
- Pasta venere has 56% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Pasta venere has 80% less sugar (3.2 g vs 16 g).
- Pasta venere has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Bio Haferpops has 19% more protein (15 g vs 12.1 g).
- Pasta venere has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pasta venere lists: Gluten, Mustard.
Ingredients
Bio Haferpops
Not available.
Pasta venere
Hartweizenvollkorngrieß (15%) und schwarzes Venere®-Mehl aus braunem Reis (25%). Kann Spuren von Sonne und Senf enthalten. Hergestellt in einer Fabrik, die Eier verwendet.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio Haferpops or Pasta venere?
Overall, Pasta venere has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pasta venere has fewer calories: 341 kcal versus 391 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pasta venere has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 16 g per 100 g.