Parówki z szynki vs Sopocka
Overall, Sopocka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Parówki z szynki | Sopocka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 281 kcal | 110 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sopocka has 61% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 281 kcal).
- Sopocka has 83% less fat (4 g vs 24 g).
- Sopocka has 84% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 9.3 g).
- Parówki z szynki has 14% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Sopocka has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
- Sopocka has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Parówki z szynki
Not available.
Sopocka
Mięso wieprzowe (80%), woda, sól, stabilizatory: E326, E261, E451; glukoza, błonnik pszenny bezglutenowy, substancja zagęszczająca: E407a; białko wieprzowe, przeciwutleniacz: E316; aromat, substancja konserwująca: E250
FAQ
Which is healthier: Parówki z szynki or Sopocka?
Overall, Sopocka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sopocka has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 281 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sopocka has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.