Parmentier de poisson vs Kystens Fiskegrateng
Overall, Kystens Fiskegrateng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Parmentier de poisson | Kystens Fiskegrateng |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 124 kcal | 133 kcal |
| Fat | 7.4 g | 5.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kystens Fiskegrateng has 20% less fat (5.9 g vs 7.4 g).
- Kystens Fiskegrateng has 69% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.3 g).
- Parmentier de poisson has 53% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.5 g).
- Parmentier de poisson has 33% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.6 g).
- Kystens Fiskegrateng has 40% more protein (6.7 g vs 4 g).
- Kystens Fiskegrateng has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Kystens Fiskegrateng lists: Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Parmentier de poisson
Not available.
Kystens Fiskegrateng
Alaska Pollock* (Theragra chalcogramma) 19%, vann, eggehvite, kokt makaroni (durumhvetemel, vann) 10%, skummetmelk, rapsolje, kavring (hvetemel, salt, gjær, sukker), stivelse, grønnsaks - pulver, sitronkonsentrat, salt, krydder (bl.a. muskat, gurkemeie, pepper) og krydderekstrakt. *Fisket i Stillehavet.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Parmentier de poisson or Kystens Fiskegrateng?
Overall, Kystens Fiskegrateng has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Parmentier de poisson has fewer calories: 124 kcal versus 133 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Parmentier de poisson has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.