Comparison
Paneer vs 8906001021469
Overall, 8906001021469 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paneer | 8906001021469 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 347 kcal | 287 kcal |
| Fat | 27.7 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.4 g | 14.7 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20.9 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 8906001021469 has 17% fewer calories (287 kcal vs 347 kcal).
- 8906001021469 has 17% less fat (23 g vs 27.7 g).
- 8906001021469 has 16% less saturated fat (14.7 g vs 17.4 g).
- 8906001021469 has no sugar, while Paneer has 3.9 g.
- 8906001021469 has no salt, while Paneer has 0.5 g.
- Paneer has 100% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0 g).
- Paneer has 14% more protein (20.9 g vs 18 g).
- Only Paneer lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Paneer
Whole MILK, Acetic acid. Citric acid.
8906001021469
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paneer or 8906001021469?
Overall, 8906001021469 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
8906001021469 has fewer calories: 287 kcal versus 347 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
8906001021469 has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.