Comparison

Palets de légumes vs Steamed Broccoli Florets

Overall, Steamed Broccoli Florets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPalets de légumesSteamed Broccoli Florets
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 112 kcal 29 kcal
Fat 3.9 g 0 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0 g
Sugars 1.7 g 1.2 g
Salt 0.9 g 0 g
Fiber 5.8 g 3.5 g
Protein 7.3 g 3.5 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Steamed Broccoli Florets has 74% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 112 kcal).
  • Steamed Broccoli Florets has no fat, while Palets de légumes has 3.9 g.
  • Steamed Broccoli Florets has no saturated fat, while Palets de légumes has 1 g.
  • Steamed Broccoli Florets has 31% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Steamed Broccoli Florets has 95% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Palets de légumes has 39% more fiber (5.8 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Palets de légumes has 52% more protein (7.3 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Steamed Broccoli Florets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Palets de légumes lists: Eggs, Milk.

Ingredients

Palets de légumes

sweet peas 38%, spinach 32%, sunflower oil, pre-fried onions (onions, sunflower oil), mozzarella 5,5% (pasteurized cow's milk, salt, lactic ferments, coagulant), corn flour, chives, egg white powder (from free-range hens), salt, may contain celery,

Steamed Broccoli Florets

Broccoli florets

FAQ

Which is healthier: Palets de légumes or Steamed Broccoli Florets?

Overall, Steamed Broccoli Florets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Steamed Broccoli Florets has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 112 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Steamed Broccoli Florets has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons