Comparison
Pains kebab vs Pains kebab
Overall, Pains kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pains kebab | Pains kebab |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 251 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 8.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 7.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pains kebab has 52% less fat (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pains kebab has 90% less sugar (0.9 g vs 8.6 g).
- Pains kebab has 81% less salt (1.4 g vs 7.4 g).
- Pains kebab has 39% more fiber (3.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Pains kebab has 26% more protein (9 g vs 6.6 g).
- Pains kebab has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pains kebab lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pains kebab
Not available.
Pains kebab
Farine de blé, Eau, Levure, Sel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pains kebab or Pains kebab?
Overall, Pains kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pains kebab has fewer calories: 251 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pains kebab has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 8.6 g per 100 g.