Comparison
Pains kebab vs Kebab z kurczaka
Overall, Kebab z kurczaka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pains kebab | Kebab z kurczaka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 8.6 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 7.4 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pains kebab has 86% less fat (1.9 g vs 13 g).
- Pains kebab has 87% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.9 g).
- Kebab z kurczaka has 68% less sugar (2.8 g vs 8.6 g).
- Kebab z kurczaka has 74% less salt (1.9 g vs 7.4 g).
- Pains kebab has 47% more fiber (3.8 g vs 2 g).
- Kebab z kurczaka has 19% more protein (8.2 g vs 6.6 g).
- Kebab z kurczaka has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pains kebab
Not available.
Kebab z kurczaka
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pains kebab or Kebab z kurczaka?
Overall, Kebab z kurczaka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pains kebab has fewer calories: 258 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kebab z kurczaka has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 8.6 g per 100 g.