Comparison
Pains kebab vs Pita broodjes
Overall, Pita broodjes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pains kebab | Pita broodjes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 245 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 8.6 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 7.4 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pita broodjes has 47% less fat (1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pita broodjes has 78% less sugar (1.9 g vs 8.6 g).
- Pita broodjes has 87% less salt (1 g vs 7.4 g).
- Pains kebab has 20% more fiber (3.8 g vs 3 g).
- Pita broodjes has 21% more protein (8.4 g vs 6.6 g).
- Pita broodjes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pita broodjes lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pains kebab
Not available.
Pita broodjes
Tarwebloem, water, bakkersgist, zout, dextrose,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pains kebab or Pita broodjes?
Overall, Pita broodjes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pita broodjes has fewer calories: 245 kcal versus 258 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pita broodjes has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 8.6 g per 100 g.