Comparison
Pains kebab vs Kebab z kurczaka
Overall, Pains kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pains kebab | Kebab z kurczaka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 251 kcal | 273 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pains kebab has 93% less fat (0.9 g vs 13 g).
- Pains kebab has 89% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pains kebab has 68% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.8 g).
- Pains kebab has 27% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pains kebab has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pains kebab lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pains kebab
Farine de blé, Eau, Levure, Sel
Kebab z kurczaka
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pains kebab or Kebab z kurczaka?
Overall, Pains kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pains kebab has fewer calories: 251 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pains kebab has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.