Original Peperami vs Salam de Sibiu
Overall, Salam de Sibiu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Original Peperami | Salam de Sibiu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 501 kcal | 475 kcal |
| Fat | 44 g | 41.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 16.6 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 3.8 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 23.4 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salam de Sibiu has 60% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2 g).
- Salam de Sibiu is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Original Peperami lists: Pork.
Ingredients
Original Peperami
pork, iodised salt (salt, potassium iodate), dextrose, spices, pork fat, flavour enhancer (monosodium glutamate, disodium inosinate, disodium guanylate), preservative (sodium nitrite), beechwood smoke
Salam de Sibiu
carne de porc, slănină, sare, zaharuri, condimente, acid ascorbic, nitrit de sodiu
FAQ
Which is healthier: Original Peperami or Salam de Sibiu?
Overall, Salam de Sibiu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salam de Sibiu has fewer calories: 475 kcal versus 501 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salam de Sibiu has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.