Comparison

Olives noires à la grecque vs Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein

Overall, Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOlives noires à la grecqueKalamata Oliven ohne Stein
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 341 kcal 279 kcal
Fat 33 g 29 g
Saturated fat 7.3 g 3.8 g
Sugars 1.7 g 0.5 g
Salt 7.5 g 3 g
Fiber 8.1 g 2.5 g
Protein 2 g 2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 18% fewer calories (279 kcal vs 341 kcal).
  • Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 12% less fat (29 g vs 33 g).
  • Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 48% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 71% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 60% less salt (3 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Olives noires à la grecque has 69% more fiber (8.1 g vs 2.5 g).

Ingredients

Olives noires à la grecque

Olives noires à la grecque - sel - huile d'olive vierge extra 1%.

Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein

Oliven* schwarz, Wasser, Meersalz, Rotweinessig* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Olives noires à la grecque or Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein?

Overall, Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has fewer calories: 279 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons