Aceitunas de Aragón vs Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein
Overall, Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Aceitunas de Aragón | Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 279 kcal |
| Fat | 33.2 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 9.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 17% fewer calories (279 kcal vs 336 kcal).
- Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 13% less fat (29 g vs 33.2 g).
- Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 25% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 5.1 g).
- Aceitunas de Aragón has no sugar, while Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 0.5 g.
- Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 25% less salt (3 g vs 4 g).
- Aceitunas de Aragón has 74% more fiber (9.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has 25% more protein (2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Aceitunas de Aragón has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Aceitunas de Aragón
olives noires, sel, acidifiant : acide lactique.
Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein
Oliven* schwarz, Wasser, Meersalz, Rotweinessig* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Aceitunas de Aragón or Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein?
Overall, Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalamata Oliven ohne Stein has fewer calories: 279 kcal versus 336 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Aceitunas de Aragón has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.