Oliva Iliada Kalamata vs Oliva peranzana
Overall, Oliva Iliada Kalamata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oliva Iliada Kalamata | Oliva peranzana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 240 kcal | 301 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 29.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 4.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 1.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oliva Iliada Kalamata has 20% fewer calories (240 kcal vs 301 kcal).
- Oliva Iliada Kalamata has 16% less fat (25 g vs 29.6 g).
- Oliva Iliada Kalamata has 12% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 4.2 g).
- Oliva peranzana has 25% less salt (3 g vs 4 g).
- Oliva peranzana has 46% more protein (2.4 g vs 1.3 g).
Ingredients
Oliva Iliada Kalamata
Not available.
Oliva peranzana
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oliva Iliada Kalamata or Oliva peranzana?
Overall, Oliva Iliada Kalamata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oliva Iliada Kalamata has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oliva Iliada Kalamata has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.