Comparison

Oliva Iliada Kalamata vs Oliva peranzana

Overall, Oliva Iliada Kalamata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOliva Iliada KalamataOliva peranzana
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — —
Calories 240 kcal 301 kcal
Fat 25 g 29.6 g
Saturated fat 3.7 g 4.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 4 g 3 g
Fiber — 3.4 g
Protein 1.3 g 2.4 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Oliva Iliada Kalamata has 20% fewer calories (240 kcal vs 301 kcal).
  • Oliva Iliada Kalamata has 16% less fat (25 g vs 29.6 g).
  • Oliva Iliada Kalamata has 12% less saturated fat (3.7 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Oliva peranzana has 25% less salt (3 g vs 4 g).
  • Oliva peranzana has 46% more protein (2.4 g vs 1.3 g).

Ingredients

Oliva Iliada Kalamata

Not available.

Oliva peranzana

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Oliva Iliada Kalamata or Oliva peranzana?

Overall, Oliva Iliada Kalamata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Oliva Iliada Kalamata has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 301 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Oliva Iliada Kalamata has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons